Feedback form for Scilab Workshop from 4 to 6 March 2021

Dear Participant,

We thank you for attending the 3 Day workshop on Scilab from 04-06 March 2021. We would like to have your valuable feedback about the Workshop and learning experience as it will help us enhance the quality of our work. Kindly select the best option that describes your views. You can also provide your comments in the spaces provided in the form. Your response will be kept confidential.

Thank you for your time!

Total number of responses : 67



1A. Your background:

Count of  'Faculty in a College'   :    28
Count of  'Lab Assistant/ Lab Staff member'   :    0
Count of  'Research Scholars/PhD Student'   :    1
Count of  'Student (B.E/B.Tech/B.Sc/Any other bachelor's degree)'   :    11
Count of  'Student (M.E/M.Tech/M.Sc/Any other Master's degree)'   :    21
Count of  'Working Professional'   :    1
Count of  'Other'   :    5




1B. If your answer to the above question is OTHER, then please specify:


Teacher


-


Teacher


EDUCATOR


Teacher


l


Teacher





2. Please mention the name of your School/College/Institute, or the company you work for, etc.


Ramaiah Institute of Technology


Bhaskaracharya college of applied sciences


Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT,COCHIN,KERALA


Marathwada Mitra Mandal's Institute Of Technology Lohgaon Pune


Faculty of Computer Technology, GLS University. Ahmedabad


Cochin University of science and technology


Bhaskaracharya college of Applied Sciences University of Delhi Nahin De


PSG COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU


College of Engineering Trivandrum, Thiruvananthapuram


Bhaskaracharya College Of Applied Sciences


Government Engineering College, Wayanad


Institute of Chemical Technology ,Mumbai Marathwada Campus Jalna


CUSAT


PSG College of Technology


Kanoria PG Mahila Mahavidyalaya


Amity School of Engineering and Technology


National Institute of Technology Manipur


PSG College of Technology


Cochin University of Science and Technology


Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi


BIT Sindri, Dhanbad


JJ C BOSE University of Science & Technology ,YMCA Faridabad


University of Kerala, Kaaryavattom


PSG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED RESEARCH


Dept of optoelectronics,University of Kerala


Dps dalhousie


PSG College of Technology


MOTILAL NEHRU NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (NIT ALLAHABAD)


COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY


BIT, Sindri, Dhanbad, Jharkhand


COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY


Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi.


Cochin University of Science and Technology


Rukmini Devi public school


BIT Sindri, Dhanbad, Jharkhand


BIT Sindri


Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai


Don Bosco College of Engiennring


SASTRA University


ARMY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PUNE


BIT Sindri


GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, PALAKKAD


Bhavan's Vivekananda College, sainikpuri, Secunderabad, Telangana


Buds International School


THE BLOSSOMS SCHOOL, ALIGARH


Dalhousie Public School Dalhousie


University college kariyavattom


University of kerala karivattom thiruvananthapuram


University college, kariyavattom, trivandrum, kerala


BIT Sindri


UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KARIAVATTOM, TRIVANDRUM


University of Kerala


P.A. College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi


Vimal Jyothy Engineering College Chemperi, Kannur


Thakur College of Engineering and Technology


University College kariavattom, tvm,kerala


Optoelectronics and optical communication University of kerala


Terna Engineering college, Nerul


UNIVERSITY OF KERALA,KARIAVATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM


COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY


VIMAL JYOTHI ENGINEERING COLLEGE


University College of Kerala


BIT Sindri


Finolex Academy of Management and Technology, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India


St Joseph's College Of Engineering


DAV Model School, Durgapur


Eklavya Model Residential School Borgaon Bazar Gondia





3. What is your age

Count of  'Less than 22'   :    10
Count of  '22 to 30'   :    27
Count of  '30 to 40'   :    21
Count of  '40 to 50'   :    6
Count of  'Above 50'   :    2




4. Generally, how comfortable are you in learning a BRAND NEW software? Please select one.

Count of  'Extremely comfortable (or fast) in learning a new software'   :    8
Count of  'Somewhat comfortable (or fast) in learning a new software'   :    42
Count of  'Neither comfortable nor uncomfortable (neither fast nor slow) in learning a new software'   :    11
Count of  'Somewhat uncomfortable (or slow) in learning a new software'   :    5
Count of  'Extremely uncomfortable (or slow) in learning a new software'   :    1




Questions related to Scilab background

5A. Do you use any numerical computation software in your School/College/Institute/company?

Count of  'Yes'   :    54
Count of  'No'   :    13




5B. If the answer to the above question is Yes, please let us know the name of the software in your School/College/Institute/company.

Count of  'Octave'   :    5
Count of  'Julia'   :    0
Count of  'Mathematica'   :    1
Count of  'Matlab'   :    42
Count of  'Python - NumPy etc.'   :    14
Count of  'Sage Math'   :    0
Count of  'Scilab'   :    15
Count of  'Other'   :    3




5C. If your answer to the above question is OTHER, then please specify:


C++


LabVIEW


EXCEL





6. How long have been using Scilab? If you have not used please select 'never used before'.

Count of  'Never used before'   :    56
Count of  'less than 1 year'   :    9
Count of  'less than 3 years'   :    1
Count of  'less than 5 years'   :    0
Count of  'more than 5 years'   :    1




7A. Have you used Scilab before you registered for this workshop?

Count of  'Yes'   :    13
Count of  'No'   :    53
Count of  'Maybe'   :    1




7B. If the answer is "Yes" to the above question, in what way do you use? Please select all the relevant options.

Count of  'Course work - class or lab'   :    12
Count of  'Research'   :    2
Count of  'Consultancy'   :    0
Count of  'Scilab Textbook companion project of FOSSEE'   :    0
Count of  'Scilab Lab migration project of FOSSEE'   :    0
Count of  'Other'   :    0




7C. If your answer to the above question is OTHER, then please specify:





8A. Why would you like to learn Scilab?

Count of  'For course work - class or lab'   :    60
Count of  'For research'   :    32
Count of  'Consultancy'   :    5
Count of  'Other'   :    3




8B. If your answer to the above question is OTHER, then please specify:


Ya


Programing


Curriculum Development


To master this skill then teach on YouTube to get revenue and satisfaction of helping new learners


Teaching Aid





9. Before today's workshop, have you attended any other Scilab workshop? Please enter the total number of days of the workshop/training you have undergone before. If you have not gone through any such workshop/training before, please choose 0 days.

Count of  '0 days'   :    63
Count of  '1 day'   :    1
Count of  '2-4 days'   :    3
Count of  '5-7 days'   :    0
Count of  'Above 7 days'   :    0




Questions related to learning in the workshop

10. Rate your experience in using Spoken Tutorial to learn Scilab. (Kindly provide the response using the scale given below, wherein 1 implies "Strongly Disagree", 2 implies "Disagree", 3 implies "Neither Disagree Nor Agree", 4 implies "Agree", and 5 implies "Strongly Agree".)





11. Using these tutorials, were you able to learn the following concepts? (Kindly respond using the scale given below, wherein 1 implies "extremely easy to learn" and 5 implies "extremely difficult to learn".)





12. Were the spoken tutorials used during the workshop helpful in solving practice problems?

Count of  'Yes'   :    54
Count of  'No'   :    1
Count of  'Somewhat'   :    12




13. Were the 9:30 am-10:00 am optional sessions to discuss the practice problems useful?

Count of  'Yes'   :    52
Count of  'No'   :    5
Count of  'Didn't attend these sessions'   :    10




14. Did the practice problems help you to improve your coding skills in using Scilab?

Count of  'Yes'   :    58
Count of  'No'   :    0
Count of  'Not sure'   :    9




15. How will you rate the difficulty of the practice problems? Please choose 1 for difficult and 5 for easy

Count of  '1'   :    0
Count of  '2'   :    8
Count of  '3'   :    36
Count of  '4'   :    22
Count of  '5'   :    1




16. How would you rate your experience of the live sessions taken during the workshop? (Kindly respond using the scale given below, wherein 1 implies "not of much use" and 5 implies "extremely useful".)





17. How would you rate your experience of the lectures and talks? (Kindly respond using the scale given below, wherein 1 implies "not of much use" and 5 implies "extremely useful".)





18. Do you think some lectures were too advanced for this workshop? If so, please mention which.


No


Lectures advance level was quite good for information but I want to see those videos again and again so that I can get completely comfortable.


Concept of xcos


Industrial applications


No


No


Good


No


I would say tool-chaining was advanced since it did not covered much details, but it is understandable owing to the time constraints.


No


No, All lectures were useful and informative.


None were too advanced


no


No


No


No


xcos


No


No


No


no


no


No


I am new power systems area, the session by Prof Jain marshal is advanced for me.


NO


Yes


Nil


Yes, XCos Part and FOSEE Optimization Toolbox needed more basic and organised approach. Few things were understandable but it could be improved for these two. Especially think of Non Electrical Background Participants level.


NO


No


NO


The differential equations using matlab was kindof difficult as before that we were just using basic operations.


NO


Yes


No


NO


No


no


No


Yes . Xcos session


No


No


no


Fossee


No


No


No


No


No


No


No


No


no


Switching to open source software by Prof. Madhu Belur


Not as such


No


Optimization


no


NO


no


NIL


No


No


Lecture by Mr. Thierry Martin


No


No


No





19. Would you have wanted more lectures? If yes, please indicate which topic you would have wanted to be covered.


Xcos, Control Systems


Machine Learning and Data Science


No


No


Yes, tool-chaing,FMU, development of Xcos palette blocks.


Differentiation and integration methods


Use of SciLAB in Power systems it was a live session but more in depth dive would've been great


Real time interfacing with devices


CFD


NO


No


more toolboxes & More applications on XCOS


Plotting 3d figures


Signal and Image Processing & Concepts for Embedded Systems


1. X-Cos Examples Solution for Electrical & Electronics 2. X-Cos for Mechanical and Civil 3. How to create Toolbox with small demo basic one 4. How to Install Scilab, GUI Builder and FOSEE Toolbox (This one in a proper video format could have been emailed to us in at least 3 days advance). 5. Live Demo of MTech problem solutions of Different Branches not only Electrical (This would generate more shift towards Scilab also)


NO


Lectures were sufficient for SCILAB


Yes


Power system


Partial Differential Equations


No


GUI and XCos


No


No


Yes. Xcos needed more lectures


No


No


Yes, Scilab in CNES


No


yes


Graphical User Interface


No


Yes,optimization and integrals


practice requird


YES.SCILAB IN CNES.


NIL


No


No


Yes





20. Please share your thoughts on the hands-on session (without Spoken Tutorials), and the Spoken Tutorial based sessions. Please tick all that is applicable.

Count of  'When many people have doubts in a hands-on session without spoken tutorials the slowest active person decides the speed of the workshop but I don't mind it'   :    15
Count of  'Had the topics of hands-on sessions been converted to Spoken Tutorials I could have used them for self learning to teach others etc.'   :    19
Count of  'Hands-on sessions are a little chaotic and I would prefer to see these topics in the form of Spoken Tutorials'   :    19
Count of  'Hands-on sessions give a personal touch and so I prefer them to sessions based on Spoken Tutorials'   :    37
Count of  'Hands-on sessions without Spoken Tutorials are impersonal in very large classes of say 100 people or more'   :    14
Count of  'The efficacy of Spoken Tutorials approach is the same whether the class size is small or very large'   :    24
Count of  'Spoken Tutorial sessions are impersonal in very large classes of say 100 people or more'   :    10




21. Rate the following aspects of the workshop:(Kindly respond using the scale given below, wherein 1 implies "Extremely bad ", 2 implies "Bad", 3 implies "Acceptable", 4 implies "Good", and 5 implies "Excellent".)





22. Comment regarding the pace of the workshop

Count of  'Slow'   :    0
Count of  'Very Slow'   :    0
Count of  'Acceptable'   :    56
Count of  'Fast'   :    10
Count of  'Very fast'   :    1




23. Select the response that describes your overall view of the workshop: (Kindly respond using the scale given below, wherein 1 implies "Strongly Disagree", 2 implies "Disagree", 3 implies "Neither Disagree Nor Agree", 4 implies "Agree", and 5 implies "Strongly Agree".)





24. How would you rate your level of knowledge in using Scilab before and after the workshop?





25. Why did you not post questions in the forum?


Spoken Tutorials worked perfectly and had no doubts then. Will practice some more and then post queries if any.


I was not having any problem in understanding through spoken tutorials


No sufficient time


I am Abeginer. First i will search my doubts in forum and if not found there i will post it


The spoken tutorial and Hands-on sessions were so good. Never came across any query during the workshop.


Need more selflearning .


I know


It's somewhat difficult to use rather using the chat box?


I have two questions put up on the forum which are yet to be answered.


I understood the topics, when I get any problem I shall post questions in the forums


Few of my queries have asked by other participants from workshop. Other things were clear from live/spoken lectures.


Most doubts were already present and answered.


well explained in spoken tutorials


I tried to post but there were some difficulties in posting


No


My queries were already answered


I was focused on learning the spoken tutorials and the live sessions.


I posted ques


NOT HAD ANY QUESTIONS


I have to practice more for asking questions.


I did not have any doubt


i did not have specific questions as i was able to solve practice problems with the help of spoken tutorials.


Have to work out more problems


whenever I had doubts, surely I will post my queries


I prefer clearing doubts my own through practise and research


Lack of knowledge


I was engaged in self learning by doing assignments and practice problems. I used help to understand basic things. I might be posting when taking up more challenging problems.


To get their answers. I also started giving answers. During Workshop day 1 I have answered 8 Questions.


BECAUSE I AM BEGINNER IN SCI LAB


Was satisfied with the lectures


NOT HAD MUCH QUESTIONS


The spoken tutorials were pretty understandable.


While practicing along with spoken tutorial results got same. I may post the questions after I gone through the spoken tutorials again in depth.


I posted


After practice


NA


Because these were easy questions. If a coder will try 4 to 5 times, he/she will get the logic.


Dint have difficulty


-


It was good session. But time was less.


Queries have been asked by other members too.


Most of my doubts are cleared by watching spoken tutorials and by doing trial and error method in scilab


Nee to practice all the problems!


Didn't have any


No reason


Follow ing instructions properly


Its fine for me


I have many questions. I will post it when I go through spoken tutorial once again.


Everything was explained clearly.


i did not face any difficulty in solving the given problem.


Every aspect(s) was almost clear and understandable.


My doubts were cleared through spoken tutorials


need to work more on different problems


Simply


I could attempt the questions to a large extent, so did not post questions in the forum


My doubts are cleared in spoken tutorial


Some topics are clear and some are not need more sections


After understanding no one can raise questions


EVERY ASPECTWAS CLEAR.I DIDN'T HAVE MUCH ISSUSES WHILE PROGRAMMING.


Was well cleared in live sections


NIL


My doubts were cleared from spoken tutorials


Will post later


Many things get clear from forum itself.


As I couldn't attend the workshop due to college classes, I was not able to post forums


I could easily understand the concept.


N





26. What aspect(s) about the workshop did you like / dislike the most?


Liked the combination of live and spoken tutorial session.


I like seeing and gathering information from the experts.


speed of live sessions was made it boredom somewhat


Industrial application


Like: Spoken tutorial and hands-on practice sessions


I like spoken tutorial.dislikes some advanced live sections .


Good


The way it is organized


Spoken tutorials proved to be much efficient and the quality of content was also exemplary. I expected detailed views on the advanced topics like optimization instead they limited to the basics. There was time wasting from audience and expect maturity in future.


The teachers are soo good in their topics


Practice problems and lecture from experts


Speed. I am a very slow learner so the pace was too much for me.


spoken tutorials were very useful


Like : xcos Dislike: optimization


Live explanation by sharing screen


I disliked the concept of posting question on mandatory terms and not getting answer during the session.


I like the expert talks from industry as well as the live sessions.


I liked the interaction from scilab team


LIVE SESSIONS AND TALKS


Doubts based on spoken tutorials may be cleared during Q ans A sessions.


Everything was perfect


Live sessions i liked & enjoyed the most. i did not dislike anything.


Nothing


Clearly scheduled and learned a lot during this workshop


Liked the Spoken tutorial, and convinced by the seniors' and experts' comments on exploitation by matlab


Not much for school teachers


I liked the way the time of participants were respected by sticking to schedule. I also liked the way it was not too technical and we had talks in between. The same talks were a bit cumbersome when they were scheduled towards the evening.


Prof Kanan Sir's Talk & GUI Demonstration by Rashmi Mam were the Best I disliked Silence part when we were doing Spoken tutorials.


I LIKE SPOKEN TUTORIAL SESSION


Explanation and pace of the Lectures.


TALKS AND PRACTICE PROBLEMS WHERE GOOD


I liked the xoc and GUI the best.


The initiative to conduct such a workshop regarding the opensource software SCILAB is appreciable. But some live sessions were too fast and experienced difficulty to follow.


Nothing for disliking, it’s an interesting and impressive learning session


Live session like most


LIKE MOST


1) I liked the hands on sessions given by Rupak Sir and Rashmi Ma'am as well as the inspirational talk by Madhu Belur Sir. 2) Some of the spoken tutorials can be converted to hands on sessions so that the learners won't feel distracted.


none


Hands-on


I like that all lectures were recorded on spoken tutorial and it does not require internet .


I liked the content of the workshop.


I like the way of learning through spoken tutorials as I can complete the hands on sessions on my own.


Cost! when most of the workshops are free( for eg . on ATAL ) why is IITB charging ? Though 950 is not a big amount for the content covered, due to pandemic not many colleges are paying the teachers so you could have reduced the cost to enable more participation, You are promoting free softwares !


Explanation and guidelines are clear


The presentation was good


Everything was fine


It is more informative a beginner like me get a good knowledge about scilab


I like the way it which promote the open source software and a new start to learn and specialize a new software


Like the way of presentation.


SciLab Tools are easier to learn and OPen source, it can be used by anyone.


Liked the spoken tutorial sessions and like to familiarise more in XCOS . And no dislikes.


I like the spoken tutorials


problem solvation


Spoken Tutorials not preferring much


I liked the pace of the workshop. There was nothing to dislike as such


I like spoken tutorial


Some topics are intresting like GUI by rashmi miss


overall best


I LIKED THE SPOKEN TUTORIAL SESSIONS.I WANTED TO LEARN MORE ABOUT GUI.CAN YOU PROVIDE SOM MATERIAL REGARDING THAT?


SPOKEN TUTORIALS


NIL


I like spoken tutorials


Sessions ESI team members


Spoken tutorial like most.


The materials and video lectures haven't been sent.


What I like most the use of Scilab in solving various mathematical operations


Good





27. Cost benefit analysis of this workshop: please choose one

Count of  'The cost of this workshop is too high'   :    9
Count of  'The cost of this workshop is just right - neither more nor less'   :    34
Count of  'It is value for money because what I learnt is worth a lot more'   :    24




MCQ questions on Scilab

Please take a minute to attend to these MCQ questions. Certificates will be given to all participants, irrespective of the correctness of your answers.

28. Select the correct method to define a row vector. Select all applicable.

Count of  'A row vector is defined using commas'   :    26
Count of  'A row vector is defined using semicolon'   :    21
Count of  'A row vector is defined using colon'   :    8
Count of  'A row vector is defined using spaces'   :    31




29. Select the correct method to define a column vector (Select all applicable)

Count of  'A column vector is defined using commas'   :    8
Count of  'A column vector is defined using semicolon'   :    43
Count of  'A column vector is defined using colon'   :    9
Count of  'A column vector is defined using spaces'   :    13




30. The command used to display the output is

Count of  'view'   :    1
Count of  'disp'   :    52
Count of  'display'   :    9
Count of  'show'   :    3




31. A colon operator is used to

Count of  'Create regularly spaced row vectors'   :    10
Count of  'Create regularly spaced column vectors'   :    8
Count of  'Both a and b'   :    36
Count of  'Neither a nor b'   :    10




32. Which of the following functions defines “Identity matrix”?

Count of  'ident'   :    4
Count of  'identity'   :    5
Count of  'ones'   :    7
Count of  'eye'   :    51




33. For a stiff system of differential equations, the following method of integration is recommended

Count of  'Explicit Euler'   :    23
Count of  'Built-in function ode'   :    19
Count of  'Explicit Euler or the built in function ode'   :    14
Count of  'No method is suitable to solve stiff systems'   :    3




34. In-line functions are defined by the command?

Count of  'function'   :    18
Count of  'func'   :    18
Count of  'deff'   :    30
Count of  'funct'   :    1




35. Which of the following functions is used for opening an existing file?

Count of  'op'   :    4
Count of  'start'   :    6
Count of  'mopen'   :    41
Count of  'read'   :    16




36. The CSCOPE block can be found under the following category of blocks in the Xcos palette browser

Count of  'Plot'   :    6
Count of  'Source'   :    10
Count of  'Sink'   :    46
Count of  'Continuous Time Systems'   :    5




37. The save command

Count of  'Saves scilab scripts'   :    21
Count of  'Saves the entire scilab session into a binary file'   :    40
Count of  'Saves 2D plots'   :    2
Count of  'None of the above'   :    4




38. In the Calling User Defined Functions in XCOS spoken tutorial, the MUX block was used for?

Count of  'Generating multiple sine wave signals'   :    10
Count of  'To club the input and output of the user-defined block for plotting'   :    32
Count of  'To enable user-defined functions'   :    15
Count of  'None of the above'   :    10




39. Which one of these are used in a Graphical User interface?(Select all applicable)

Count of  'Radiobutton'   :    12
Count of  'Pushbutton'   :    21
Count of  'Slider'   :    15
Count of  'All of them'   :    42




Effectiveness of the current and conventional workshops

You may have undergone some other workshop on Scilab. We want you to compare that experience with the current experience. There are only two, but important, questions in this section. Please take a few minutes to understand the questions and answer them.

40. Compare the method of learning through Spoken Tutorials with CONVENTIONAL software training workshops you may have attended *





41. This question has to do with the CURRENT workshop using Spoken Tutorials





General

42. We have provided you with Scilab Spoken Tutorials and many other learning materials in this workshop. What else is required for you to conduct a similar workshop in your institution by yourself? (Kindly respond using the scale given below, wherein 1 implies "Strongly Disagree", 2 implies "Disagree", 3 implies "Neither Disagree Nor Agree", 4 implies "Agree", and 5 implies "Strongly Agree".) *





43A. Check all the activities of the FOSSEE Scilab team that you will be interested to participate in.

Count of  'Scilab Lab migration'   :    38
Count of  'Simulink to Xcos migration'   :    22
Count of  'Scilab textbook companion'   :    42
Count of  'Xcos textbook companion'   :    23
Count of  'Conducting workshops using the instructional material created by the Scilab team'   :    26
Count of  'Going through research papers and identifying case studies that could be simulated in Scilab/Xcos'   :    25
Count of  'Other'   :    4




43B. If your answer to the above question is OTHER, then please specify:


Scilab in civil engineering field


Good


Creating specific applications for Biomedical field


Social Media Promotion especially on YouTube


-





44. What in your opinion are some other tasks the Scilab team should undertake? Please check all that is applicable.

Count of  'Create more spoken tutorials'   :    43
Count of  'Promote Scilab in a bigger way'   :    27
Count of  'Collect Scilab case studies'   :    32
Count of  'Develop material for data acquisition and control through Scilab'   :    26
Count of  'Create many more textbook companions'   :    27
Count of  'Migrate many more labs into Scilab'   :    22
Count of  'Create school level topics using Scilab'   :    22
Count of  'Conduct many more workshops using Spoken Tutorials'   :    32
Count of  'Conduct Scilab workshops especially for school teachers'   :    15




45. In what way you can help promote the use of Scilab?


Selected for internship for spoken tutorials in Scilab. hope to contribute through same.


I want to learn it heartily first and then can teach my family and friends . Can suggest to my juniors.


I can encourage the students to use Scilab. My institute advocates open source policy, all our lab machines are running on Linux so students are used to working on such software.


Workshops


By use in labs


In my college I find lack of mentorship as a bottleneck to the use of Scilab. Faculties et used with the pirated versions and paid licenses. The attitude among students and teachers must be changed from the ground level.


By contributing TBC and lab Migration Workshop


I can ask my colleagues and peers to use scilab.


inform my colleagues about the scilab & its usefulness over matlab


As a faculty , in every possible way like using in my teaching, spreading a word in teachers & students, contributing towards Scilab with the help of students.


SCILAB helps to learn easily and know-how to use for the appropriate application


Im Mtech student in Optoelectronics. I can contributr by solving the problems from optics and photonics textbooks


1. Disseminate information to the student community on the aspects of Scilab. 2. Encourage students to use it . 3. Make a quich presentation on FOSSEE in any guest lectures to be delivered


I am a YouTuber. So, I would like to have live sessions from experts of your team on my channel to reach wider audience (Mostly on applicability of Scilab & How to develop these skills to level to get job). Apart from that I would love to make YouTube Video Lectures simplifying spoken tutorials in layman's language (simplest possible way). In future if there is any free or paid workshop I would love to make video on that, especially free then all my subscribers will be interested. I have already made one video on How to Download Codes from Scilab Textbook Companion and Use it for MTech Assignment of Making Good Scilab Programs in Materials Science.


Can start working on SCILAB


-


practicing session


Conducting Workshop in our Institution


Will promote the use of scilab in college projects


To insist on the inclusion in the syllabus


Promoting in schools


I am from photonics branch. We are currently planning to contribute in sulab textbook companion.


Telling about Scilab to the students.


Conduct more workshops


Conduct workshops


encourage students to perform lab exp. on scilab


I WILL USE SCILAB IN PLACE OF MATLAB,LABVIEW ETC


Conduct more workshops no


By taking Practical in Scilab


N





46. Suggestions for improvement or any other suggestions.


Very good experience


Kindly arrange such a fruitful workshop on how can we integrate Python or R with Scilab.


No


Need break in between sessions. Timings need to change. Need spoken tutorial sessions on some dedicated days.


Identifying a motivated faculty in college/schools.


Nil


Make it more powerful for larger computations


NIL


Everything is fine


As i am new to the experience, so i feel FOSSE team is doing extremely well.


nil


As mentioned by the FOSSEE team, Hackathons could be conducted and promote inclusive of departments such as Biomedical engg which has got a seperate stream in GATE examination itself.


First thing is that Email which you sent could have been more self explanatory. Rather than 1 big email there could have been a series of emails at different point of time in advance. Big Institutes like IIT and NIT and other's you could have directly written to their directors and encouraged more participation. I got to know from Scilab Website. So, it can be improved. All sessions were for participants, I suggest first session by Prof Kanan Sir could have been live and open to all, maybe streaming to YouTube also. A good marketing strategy. Your all Spoken tutorials of Scilab are not in SWAYAM Course. Last ones are missing from there I think, so those could be improved. Scilab Spoken Tutorials Series should be there which is using 6.1.0 latest version and Windows OS in that way it would be more user friendly and more reach. Spoken Tutorials till Matrix could have been briefed to go through in advance. Or 1 day little intro half day, then 1 day break to sink in basic and methodology be ready with doubts and then Saturday and Sunday back to back live Sessions. Rashmi Mam was initially very fast but she later managed, that needs to be taken care of. Also in each day sessions there were certain PDFs used in session. That could have been shared at that moment or emailed at that moment. Previous big email caused many participants confusions. MS Teams is better platform with better features for workshops with less than 300 peoples. In our college classes are conducted on it and super easy. You could have created a team of say 100-150 participants and scheduled sessions therein. Recordings are automatically available, no need to upload anywhere. In file section should have shared relevant PDF one by one as things moved forward. There is even quiz and grade system in MS Teams, which could have made things more interesting. Needless to say all functionalities of Zoom are already there in MS Teams. Xcos & FOSSEE Toolbox are a way up things and for new user more user friendly algorithm to teach them should be there so that it not look tough task but an interesting and easy endeavor. Lecture Recordings of Live sessions are a must kindly upload those especially one on GUI & FOSEE Tools & Differential Equations. Examples could be branch specific to create more interest like one from Mechanical, one from civil and there are many from Electrical and Electronics though.


Workshop was interactive and I had pleasure attending the same.


-


The initiative to conduct such a workshop regarding the opensource software SCILAB is appreciable. But some live sessions were too fast and experienced difficulty to follow. The voice clarity of the live sessions should be checked in online workshops. Some live sessions interrupted by internet connectivity issues.


na


It was good


Xcos tutorial should add more and needs explanation and elaboration.


NA


Add more tutorials


Create more workshops


Need more topics covering in live section like 3 or 4 questions to do


Thanks


NOTHING MUCH.EVERYHTING WAS GOOD.


Create more spoken tutorials


Every thing is fine. Thanks to all


H